PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHLIX vs. AGEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y (AGEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLIX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than AGEYX's 6.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AHLIX has underperformed AGEYX with an annualized return of 5.14%, while AGEYX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.


AHLIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.58%
YTD
12.80%
6M
14.69%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
5.14%

AGEYX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.40%
YTD
6.85%
6M
8.45%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
7.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
12.80%2.59%2.07%-3.85%16.94%5.09%10.71%0.44%2.52%5.23%
AGEYX
American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y
6.85%19.15%15.85%13.10%-12.62%6.91%2.54%13.49%-3.42%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AHLIX and AGEYX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

-0.02

The correlation between AHLIX and AGEYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHLIX vs. AGEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHLIX
AHLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AHLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

AGEYX
AGEYX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AGEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
AGEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) and American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y (AGEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHLIXAGEYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

2.64

-1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.42

6.83

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.40

30.65

-10.24

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is lower than the AGEYX Sharpe Ratio of 5.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLIX and AGEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHLIXAGEYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

5.79

-2.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.59

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.59

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.38

-0.91

Drawdowns

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLIX drawdown since its inception was -21.62%, roughly equal to the maximum AGEYX drawdown of -22.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLIX and AGEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHLIXAGEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

-22.24%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.91%

-3.15%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-4.77%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-22.24%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

-22.24%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-3.55%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.70%

+0.84%

Volatility

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y (AGEYX) at 0.83%. This indicates that AHLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHLIXAGEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

0.83%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

3.05%

+4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.87%

3.72%

+7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.63%

5.16%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.48%

4.99%

+4.49%

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLIX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than AGEYX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHLIX vs. AGEYX - Dividend Comparison

AHLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, less than AGEYX's 9.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGEYX
American Beacon Developing World Income Fund Class Y
9.78%9.99%12.16%9.64%7.50%7.90%7.34%8.61%9.88%7.30%8.43%7.03%
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
7.32%8.25%0.55%1.10%17.63%7.44%5.33%4.47%1.83%4.01%0.00%3.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHLIX and AGEYX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHLIX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to AGEYX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLIX dropped -21.62% vs AGEYX's -22.24%.

AGEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHLIX and AGEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer