AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE
AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and ICGA.DE (iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both China Equities funds - AH50.DE tracks the MSCI China NR USD while ICGA.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AH50.DE returned 1.06%/yr vs -4.32%/yr for ICGA.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AH50.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ICGA.DE.
Performance
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AH50.DE achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than ICGA.DE's -6.86% return.
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- -9.46%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -4.32%
- 10Y*
- —
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 13.38% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 2.97% | 14.92% | 10.35% |
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -6.86% | 16.64% | 27.28% | -14.71% | -15.17% | -17.27% | 15.31% | 14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between AH50.DE and ICGA.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AH50.DE and ICGA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AH50.DE
ICGA.DE
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AH50.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.04 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 0.16 | +4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 0.34 | +12.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AH50.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.15 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.15 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.05 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AH50.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.20%, smaller than the maximum ICGA.DE drawdown of -55.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AH50.DE and ICGA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AH50.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -55.95% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -16.84% | +9.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -24.41% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -49.32% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -32.56% | +26.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -28.80% | +12.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 8.08% | -5.65% |
Volatility
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) is 5.94%, while iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that AH50.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AH50.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 7.19% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 13.31% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 18.64% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.21% | 27.66% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 26.97% | -4.15% |
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AH50.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ICGA.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
AH50.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Dividend Comparison
AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while ICGA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AH50.DE and ICGA.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICGA.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.
AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD, while ICGA.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AH50.DE and 0.28% for ICGA.DE.
Find the right allocation for AH50.DE and ICGA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer