PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

AGVT.AX (BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF) and UMAX.AX (Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGVT.AX is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Australian Government 7 - 12 Year AUD TR Index, while UMAX.AX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BetaShares. AGVT.AX is passively managed, while UMAX.AX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AGVT.AX returned -1.75%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for UMAX.AX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF (AGVT.AX) and Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGVT.AX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than UMAX.AX's -0.54% return.

AGVT.AX

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.42%
6M
0.55%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
0.49%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*
—

UMAX.AX

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.97%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AGVT.AX
BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF		1.42%2.82%1.31%5.73%-15.36%-4.41%6.34%0.18%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		-0.54%4.00%31.81%15.37%-9.29%29.75%-6.67%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AGVT.AX and UMAX.AX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2019

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF

Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF

Often compared with AGVT.AX:
AGVT.AX vs. GOVT.AXAGVT.AX vs. IGB.AXAGVT.AX vs. RGB.AXAGVT.AX vs. RSM.AXAGVT.AX vs. VGB.AXAGVT.AX vs. A200.AXAGVT.AX vs. ARMR.AX
Often compared with UMAX.AX:
UMAX.AX vs. CORE.AXUMAX.AX vs. F100.AXUMAX.AX vs. FOOD.AXUMAX.AX vs. GEAR.AXUMAX.AX vs. IHOO.AXUMAX.AX vs. SEMI.AXUMAX.AX vs. VDCO.AX

Return for Risk

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AGVT.AX
AGVT.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AGVT.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX
UMAX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF (AGVT.AX) and Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AGVT.AXUMAX.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.10
0.65

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.17
0.94

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.12

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

0.58

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

1.35

-1.19

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGVT.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGVT.AX and UMAX.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGVT.AX drawdown since its inception was -22.88%, smaller than the maximum UMAX.AX drawdown of -24.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGVT.AX and UMAX.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AGVT.AXUMAX.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-24.10%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.03%

-11.14%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.54%

-15.42%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-17.14%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-24.10%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.95%

-1.61%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-5.15%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.86%

-1.79%

Volatility

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF (AGVT.AX) is 1.18%, while Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that AGVT.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMAX.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AGVT.AXUMAX.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

3.05%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.07%

7.92%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.95%

9.94%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

12.93%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

13.42%

-6.19%

Dividends

AGVT.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Dividend Comparison

AGVT.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than UMAX.AX's 3.16% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGVT.AX
BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF		3.37%3.76%2.93%2.94%2.29%1.08%1.06%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		3.16%5.33%2.19%4.02%5.79%5.05%7.02%5.43%4.06%3.16%4.12%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

AGVT.AX and UMAX.AX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGVT.AX is categorized as Government Bonds, while UMAX.AX is Global Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGVT.AX and UMAX.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer