PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF (AGVT.AX) and Russell Investments Australian Government Bond ETF (RGB.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGVT.AX achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than RGB.AX's 1.56% return.


AGVT.AX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.10%
6M
0.67%
YTD
1.45%
1Y
0.90%
3Y*
2.89%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*

RGB.AX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.32%
6M
0.92%
YTD
1.56%
1Y
0.50%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
0.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AGVT.AX
BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF
1.45%2.82%1.31%5.73%-15.36%-4.41%6.34%0.18%
RGB.AX
Russell Investments Australian Government Bond ETF
1.56%1.29%2.23%4.47%-13.14%-3.68%5.45%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AGVT.AX and RGB.AX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2019

0.83

The correlation between AGVT.AX and RGB.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGVT.AX
AGVT.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AGVT.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGVT.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

RGB.AX
RGB.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RGB.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGB.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGB.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RGB.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGB.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF (AGVT.AX) and Russell Investments Australian Government Bond ETF (RGB.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGVT.AXRGB.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.02

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.10

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

0.19

+0.10

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGVT.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the RGB.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGVT.AX and RGB.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGVT.AX drawdown since its inception was -22.88%, which is greater than RGB.AX's maximum drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGVT.AX and RGB.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGVT.AXRGB.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-19.94%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.03%

-5.77%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.54%

-5.77%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-19.65%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.93%

-8.87%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-5.83%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.09%

-0.03%

Volatility

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF (AGVT.AX) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Russell Investments Australian Government Bond ETF (RGB.AX) at 1.09%. This indicates that AGVT.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGB.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGVT.AXRGB.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.09%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

4.61%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.95%

5.73%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

7.34%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

6.58%

+0.65%

Dividends

AGVT.AX vs. RGB.AX - Dividend Comparison

AGVT.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than RGB.AX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGVT.AX
BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF
3.37%3.76%2.93%2.94%2.29%1.08%1.06%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RGB.AX
Russell Investments Australian Government Bond ETF
2.22%2.46%2.24%1.43%1.70%2.99%3.19%2.86%1.88%0.81%2.55%4.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGVT.AX and RGB.AX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGVT.AX tracks Solactive Australian Government 7 - 12 Year AUD TR Index, while RGB.AX tracks Russell Investments Australian Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Russell.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGVT.AX and RGB.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer