PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGRO vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AGRO vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRO achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 16.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AGRO has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 0.95%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.48% annualized return.


AGRO

1D
3.10%
1M
-11.80%
6M
24.56%
YTD
31.16%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
0.95%

XOM

1D
1.03%
1M
-5.27%
6M
12.96%
YTD
16.96%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
22.21%
10Y*
8.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRO vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
31.16%-12.37%-12.39%38.60%11.50%12.94%-18.76%20.26%-32.69%-0.39%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
16.96%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRO and XOM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGRO:

$5.82B

XOM:

$575.42B

EPS

AGRO:

$0.03

XOM:

$5.96

PE Ratio

AGRO:

366.37

XOM:

23.32

PEG Ratio

AGRO:

0.12

XOM:

1.08

PS Ratio

AGRO:

3.48

XOM:

1.81

PB Ratio

AGRO:

3.01

XOM:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGRO:

$1.50B

XOM:

$326.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGRO:

$378.81M

XOM:

$83.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGRO:

$466.25M

XOM:

$60.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGRO vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRO
AGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRO vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGROXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.23

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

3.24

-2.20

AGRO vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRO and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGRO vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRO drawdown since its inception was -73.70%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRO and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGROXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.70%

-62.40%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.99%

-20.11%

-19.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.99%

-20.11%

-19.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.34%

-20.51%

-24.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.07%

-61.34%

-10.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.08%

-18.46%

-13.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-10.22%

-21.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.75%

7.65%

+8.10%

Volatility

AGRO vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) has a higher volatility of 16.23% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 7.89%. This indicates that AGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGROXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.23%

7.89%

+8.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.67%

20.76%

+19.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.55%

24.73%

+23.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.03%

26.71%

+15.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.97%

28.25%

+11.72%

Dividends

AGRO vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

AGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than XOM's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
2.87%4.41%3.63%2.95%3.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.94%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

AGRO vs. XOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adecoagro S.A. and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
398.68M
83.16B
(AGRO) Total Revenue
(XOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGRO vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Adecoagro S.A. and Exxon Mobil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
29.7%
37.7%
Portfolio components
AGRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a gross profit of 118.57M and revenue of 398.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

AGRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported an operating income of 27.86M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

AGRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Adecoagro S.A. reported a net income of 40.14M and revenue of 398.68M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AGRO and XOM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGRO has higher volatility (16.23%) compared to XOM (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRO dropped -73.70% vs XOM's -62.40%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGRO and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer