AGRH vs. CUSD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD).
AGRH and CUSD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGRH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. CUSD is an actively managed fund by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021.
Performance
AGRH vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGRH vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRH iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.51% | 6.00% | 5.93% | 6.40% | 1.76% |
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 1.37% | 5.02% | 4.57% | 6.05% | 2.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGRH achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 1.37% return.
AGRH
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CUSD
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGRH vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGRH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGRH vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank
AGRH
CUSD
AGRH vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGRH | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.92 | 0.38 | +2.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 0.66 | +3.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.11 | +0.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 0.91 | +2.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.48 | 2.63 | +16.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGRH | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 0.38 | +2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.05 | 0.73 | +2.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGRH and CUSD is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AGRH vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison
AGRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than CUSD's 13.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRH iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.63% | 5.17% | 4.69% | 1.24% |
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 13.86% | 14.05% | 7.10% | 3.62% | 1.14% |
Drawdowns
AGRH vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGRH drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRH and CUSD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGRH | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -5.42% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.57% | -5.42% | +3.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -2.80% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.40% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 1.88% | -1.60% |
Volatility
AGRH vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) is 0.61%, while CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that AGRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGRH | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 4.22% | -3.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.97% | 9.47% | -8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 12.90% | -11.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.80% | 6.54% | -4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.80% | 6.54% | -4.74% |