PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGRDX vs. FGLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6 (AGRDX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRDX achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than FGLGX's 10.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGRDX having a 17.30% annualized return and FGLGX not far behind at 16.45%.


AGRDX

1D
-0.52%
1M
7.79%
YTD
8.72%
6M
7.75%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
17.30%

FGLGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.30%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.09%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGRDX
JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6
8.72%15.66%26.66%43.81%-31.15%28.29%35.69%35.89%-1.22%29.85%
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
10.11%28.57%27.45%24.80%-7.23%26.53%10.01%32.37%-8.95%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRDX and FGLGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.80

The correlation between AGRDX and FGLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGRDX vs. FGLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRDX
AGRDX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AGRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FGLGX
FGLGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6 (AGRDX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGRDXFGLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.70

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

3.71

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.50

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.66

16.03

-10.38

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the FGLGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRDX and FGLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGRDXFGLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.70

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.01

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.90

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Drawdowns

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRDX drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FGLGX drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRDX and FGLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGRDXFGLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.73%

-36.42%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-9.43%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-18.75%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.73%

-21.21%

-13.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.73%

-36.42%

+1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.24%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-3.78%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.06%

+2.89%

Volatility

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6 (AGRDX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) at 2.89%. This indicates that AGRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGRDXFGLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

2.89%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

9.34%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

12.27%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

16.89%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

18.37%

+2.94%

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGRDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FGLGX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGRDX vs. FGLGX - Dividend Comparison

AGRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.95%, more than FGLGX's 8.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGRDX
JPMorgan Research Enhanced Equity Fund Class R6
14.95%16.25%5.72%4.64%5.01%9.55%5.24%5.86%13.94%9.95%4.58%6.71%
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
8.94%9.84%7.99%5.29%6.55%9.22%5.36%7.25%12.29%4.61%1.69%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGRDX and FGLGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGRDX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FGLGX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRDX dropped -34.73% vs FGLGX's -36.42%.

FGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGRDX and FGLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer