AGOX vs. GMMA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AGOX (Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF) and GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. AGOX is actively managed, while GMMA is passively managed. Over the past year, AGOX returned 26.89% vs 11.11% for GMMA. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGOX charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GMMA.

Performance

AGOX vs. GMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGOX achieves a 21.85% return, which is significantly higher than GMMA's 3.89% return.

AGOX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 8.07%
• YTD: 21.85%
• 6M: 19.22%
• 1Y: 26.89%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: —

GMMA

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 4.03%
• 1Y: 11.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGOX vs. GMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AGOX Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF	21.85%	8.58%	-0.17%
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF	3.89%	8.95%	0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AGOX and GMMA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.62

The correlation between AGOX and GMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

AGOX vs. GMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGOX	GMMA
Technology	50.1%	35.6%
Industrials	9.6%	8.3%
Communication Services	9.6%	11.2%
Healthcare	9.2%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	10.1%
Financial Services	4.8%	11.8%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	4.9%
Utilities	2.1%	2.4%
Energy	1.8%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.9%

Return for Risk

AGOX vs. GMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGOX

AGOX Risk / Return Rank: 42
AGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

GMMA

GMMA Risk / Return Rank: 66
GMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGOX vs. GMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) and GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGOX	GMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.10	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.99	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.41	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	3.29	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	11.46	-5.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGOX vs. GMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the GMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGOX and GMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGOX	GMMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	2.10	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.11	-0.60

Drawdowns

AGOX vs. GMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGOX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than GMMA's maximum drawdown of -5.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGOX and GMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGOX	GMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.93%	-5.21%	-21.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.32%	-3.39%	-11.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.14%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.17%	-1.23%	-6.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	0.97%	+3.22%

Volatility

AGOX vs. GMMA - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF (AGOX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) at 1.85%. This indicates that AGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGOX	GMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	1.85%	+4.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.91%	4.09%	+11.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.35%	5.32%	+13.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.67%	7.10%	+12.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.67%	7.10%	+12.57%

AGOX vs. GMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGOX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than GMMA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGOX vs. GMMA - Dividend Comparison

AGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than GMMA's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AGOX Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF	2.65%	3.23%	3.94%	0.27%	0.20%	6.36%
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF	3.64%	3.00%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGOX and GMMA in my portfolio?

AGOX and GMMA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGOX or GMMA?

AGOX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to GMMA (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGOX dropped -26.93% vs GMMA's -5.21%.

Which ETF is better, AGOX or GMMA?

On 1-year performance, AGOX leads with 26.89% vs 11.11% for GMMA. On fees, GMMA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GMMA has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AGOX or GMMA?

Over the 1-year period, AGOX has performed better with a 26.89% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGOX or GMMA?

GMMA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for AGOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGOX or GMMA?

GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.65% for AGOX.

What is the main difference between AGOX and GMMA?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive Funds and GammaRoad Capital Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for AGOX and 0.75% for GMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.