AGNG vs. MDEV
AGNG (Global X Aging Population ETF) and MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - AGNG tracks the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index while MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AGNG returned 8.25%/yr vs -2.86%/yr for MDEV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGNG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for MDEV.
Performance
AGNG vs. MDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGNG achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly higher than MDEV's -11.48% return.
AGNG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 6M
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGNG vs. MDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | -4.79% | 20.01% | 7.03% | 9.65% | -8.61% | -5.19% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGNG and MDEV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between AGNG and MDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
AGNG vs. MDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AGNG
MDEV
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
AGNG
MDEV
Real Estate
AGNG
MDEV
-
Basic Materials
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Communication Services
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Consumer Cyclical
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Consumer Defensive
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Energy
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Financial Services
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Industrials
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Technology
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Utilities
AGNG
-
MDEV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGNG vs. MDEV — Risk / Return Rank
AGNG
MDEV
AGNG vs. MDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGNG | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | -0.44 | +1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | -0.53 | +1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.94 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -0.39 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | -0.98 | +3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGNG | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -0.44 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.32 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
AGNG vs. MDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGNG drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, smaller than the maximum MDEV drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNG and MDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGNG | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -42.34% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -18.13% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -22.50% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -33.76% | +22.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -25.65% | +19.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 7.22% | -3.02% |
Volatility
AGNG vs. MDEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is 3.87%, while First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that AGNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGNG | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 4.60% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 11.42% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 16.00% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 18.98% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 18.98% | -1.85% |
AGNG vs. MDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGNG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MDEV's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGNG vs. MDEV - Dividend Comparison
AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.92% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGNG and MDEV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDEV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to AGNG (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNG dropped -30.58% vs MDEV's -42.34%.
On 3-year performance, AGNG leads with 8.25% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AGNG has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AGNG has performed better with a 8.25% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index, while MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AGNG and 0.70% for MDEV.
AGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGNG and MDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer