AGNG vs. IXJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ).
AGNG and IXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGNG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. It was launched on May 9, 2016. IXJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2001. Both AGNG and IXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AGNG vs. IXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGNG vs. IXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.54% | 20.01% | 7.03% | 9.65% | -8.61% | 3.91% | 18.96% | 25.24% | -1.45% | 28.17% |
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | -2.96% | 14.99% | 0.55% | 3.62% | -4.94% | 19.60% | 12.74% | 23.23% | 2.83% | 20.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGNG achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than IXJ's -2.96% return.
AGNG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- —
IXJ
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGNG vs. IXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGNG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IXJ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGNG vs. IXJ — Risk / Return Rank
AGNG
IXJ
AGNG vs. IXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGNG | IXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.40 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 0.68 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.09 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 0.50 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 1.37 | +4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGNG | IXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.40 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.40 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGNG and IXJ is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AGNG vs. IXJ - Dividend Comparison
AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IXJ's 1.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.87% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.04% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 1.44% | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.38% | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.42% | 2.11% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
AGNG vs. IXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGNG drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, smaller than the maximum IXJ drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNG and IXJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGNG | IXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -40.60% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | -10.35% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -18.14% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.11% | -7.07% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -6.92% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.78% | -0.80% |
Volatility
AGNG vs. IXJ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) at 5.11%. This indicates that AGNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGNG | IXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 5.11% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 10.23% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 17.33% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 14.08% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 15.66% | +1.51% |