AGNG vs. EDOC
AGNG (Global X Aging Population ETF) and EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Global X - AGNG tracks the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index while EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AGNG returned 3.96%/yr vs -14.71%/yr for EDOC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGNG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for EDOC.
Performance
AGNG vs. EDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGNG achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly higher than EDOC's -15.57% return.
AGNG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 6M
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
EDOC
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 6M
- -20.78%
- 1Y
- -22.08%
- 3Y*
- -10.46%
- 5Y*
- -14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
AGNG vs. EDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | -4.79% | 20.01% | 7.03% | 9.65% | -8.61% | 3.91% | 8.98% |
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -15.57% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 23.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGNG and EDOC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AGNG and EDOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGNG vs. EDOC — Risk / Return Rank
AGNG
EDOC
AGNG vs. EDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) and Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGNG | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.85 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -0.72 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | -1.46 | +3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGNG | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -1.01 | +1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.56 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.39 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
AGNG vs. EDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGNG drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, smaller than the maximum EDOC drawdown of -65.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNG and EDOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGNG | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -65.76% | +35.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -30.71% | +19.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -35.78% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -60.36% | +34.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -63.55% | +52.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -43.02% | +37.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 15.13% | -10.93% |
Volatility
AGNG vs. EDOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) is 3.87%, while Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that AGNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGNG | EDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 5.21% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 15.69% | -5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 21.89% | -8.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 26.37% | -11.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 26.18% | -9.05% |
AGNG vs. EDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGNG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EDOC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGNG vs. EDOC - Dividend Comparison
AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than EDOC's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF | 0.92% | 0.88% | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.49% | 0.72% | 0.36% | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGNG and EDOC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to AGNG (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNG dropped -30.58% vs EDOC's -65.76%.
On 5-year performance, AGNG leads with 3.96% vs -14.71% for EDOC. On fees, AGNG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AGNG has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AGNG has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGNG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
AGNG has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.39% for EDOC.
AGNG tracks Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index, while EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AGNG and 0.68% for EDOC.
AGNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGNG and EDOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer