AGNCM vs. XLV

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

AGNCM (AGNC Investment Corp.) is a stock, while XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, AGNCM returned 7.79%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for XLV. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AGNCM vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCM) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGNCM achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 4.95% return.

AGNCM

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: 4.79%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 1Y: 8.63%
• 3Y*: 13.11%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: —

XLV

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 7.36%
• 6M: 4.32%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 1Y: 23.50%
• 3Y*: 8.65%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGNCM vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AGNCM AGNC Investment Corp.	6.16%	5.19%	18.72%	27.86%	-16.44%	10.76%	4.22%	10.14%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	4.95%	14.50%	2.47%	2.07%	-2.08%	26.04%	13.30%	13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AGNCM and XLV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019	0.20

Return for Risk

AGNCM vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGNCM

AGNCM Risk / Return Rank: 85
AGNCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
AGNCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AGNCM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AGNCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AGNCM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 53
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 51
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGNCM vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCM) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGNCM	XLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.49	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.35	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	2.25	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	5.33	+3.57

AGNCM vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGNCM Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGNCM and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AGNCM vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGNCM drawdown since its inception was -55.99%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGNCM and XLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGNCM	XLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.99%	-39.17%	-16.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.64%	-10.47%	+6.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.96%	-17.11%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.38%	-17.11%	-11.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-2.04%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-7.10%	+3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	4.42%	-3.45%

Volatility

AGNCM vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCM) is 2.00%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that AGNCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGNCM	XLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.00%	6.44%	-4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.46%	11.87%	-7.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.71%	15.85%	-10.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	14.99%	-1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.33%	16.63%	+9.70%

Dividends

AGNCM vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

AGNCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than XLV's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGNCM AGNC Investment Corp.	8.62%	9.09%	8.94%	7.31%	8.66%	6.67%	6.91%	5.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.57%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGNCM and XLV in my portfolio?

AGNCM and XLV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGNCM or XLV?

XLV has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to AGNCM (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGNCM dropped -55.99% vs XLV's -39.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGNCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.