PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AGMI vs. GLCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO).

AGMI and GLCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on May 2, 2024. GLCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011.

Performance

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF		4.33%176.11%-0.74%
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF		4.62%148.81%6.32%
Different Trading Currencies

AGMI is traded in USD, while GLCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GLCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than GLCC.TO's 4.62% return.

AGMI

1D
7.31%
1M
-24.71%
YTD
4.33%
6M
30.88%
1Y
134.41%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

GLCC.TO

1D
6.06%
1M
-20.00%
YTD
4.62%
6M
21.05%
1Y
92.55%
3Y*
42.22%
5Y*
22.79%
10Y*
16.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Themes Silver Miners ETF

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

Often compared with AGMI:
AGMI vs. AUMIAGMI vs. SILAGMI vs. SLVR.LAGMI vs. GLDMAGMI vs. SSLN.LAGMI vs. GDXJAGMI vs. SLVP
Often compared with GLCC.TO:
GLCC.TO vs. AMAX.TOGLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TOGLCC.TO vs. BCCCGLCC.TO vs. GLDI.LGLCC.TO vs. WAF.AXGLCC.TO vs. IGLDGLCC.TO vs. 4GLD.DE

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.

GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF

Return for Risk

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AGMI
AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO
GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AGMIGLCC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.82

2.16

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

2.42

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.19

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.50

12.15

+2.35

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGMI and GLCC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AGMIGLCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.16

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.68

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.50

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

0.00

+1.71

Correlation

The correlation between AGMI and GLCC.TO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than GLCC.TO's 6.21% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF		4.24%4.43%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF		6.21%6.01%10.30%11.16%10.08%6.31%6.47%4.58%5.62%7.09%9.21%11.63%

Drawdowns

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and GLCC.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

AGMIGLCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-71.12%

+37.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.26%

-28.86%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-37.60%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.83%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.71%

-18.48%

-6.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-34.62%

+26.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.09%

7.54%

+1.55%

Volatility

AGMI vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 19.65% compared to Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) at 17.43%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

AGMIGLCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.65%

17.43%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.10%

35.52%

+6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.05%

43.15%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.43%

33.75%

+9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.43%

33.99%

+9.44%