AGMI vs. FGDL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL).

AGMI and FGDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on May 2, 2024. FGDL is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Jun 30, 2022. Both AGMI and FGDL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AGMI vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AGMI vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	8.83%	176.11%	-0.74%
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	10.02%	64.15%	14.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's 10.02% return.

AGMI

• 1D: 4.32%
• 1M: -20.30%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 35.28%
• 1Y: 144.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGDL

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -10.91%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 22.55%
• 1Y: 52.44%
• 3Y*: 33.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGMI vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.

AGMI

Themes Silver Miners ETF

FGDL

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

Return for Risk

AGMI vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGMI

AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 95
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FGDL

FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 84
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGMI vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGMI	FGDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	1.88	+1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.29	+0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.34	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	2.68	+1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.72	9.56	+6.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AGMI vs. FGDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the FGDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGMI and FGDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGMI	FGDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03	1.88	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.79	1.55	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between AGMI and FGDL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AGMI vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	4.07%	4.43%	1.81%
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AGMI vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than FGDL's maximum drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and FGDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGMI	FGDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.26%	-19.23%	-14.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.26%	-19.23%	-14.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.46%	-12.10%	-9.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.18%	-3.35%	-4.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.19%	5.39%	+3.80%

Volatility

AGMI vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison

Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a higher volatility of 18.58% compared to Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) at 10.10%. This indicates that AGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGMI	FGDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.58%	10.10%	+8.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.28%	24.42%	+17.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.18%	28.02%	+20.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.49%	18.97%	+24.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.49%	18.97%	+24.52%