AGIQ vs. WNTR
AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. AGIQ is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. AGIQ charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
AGIQ vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGIQ achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 8.06% return.
AGIQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 7.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WNTR
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 15.85%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 116.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGIQ vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF | 7.36% | 13.79% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 8.06% | 74.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGIQ and WNTR is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | -0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGIQ vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
AGIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WNTR
AGIQ vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGIQ | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGIQ vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGIQ drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGIQ and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGIQ | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -42.65% | +22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -11.84% | +6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -20.57% | +14.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility
AGIQ vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGIQ | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.15% | 53.81% | -29.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 53.62% | -29.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 53.62% | -29.47% |
AGIQ vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGIQ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGIQ vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF | 1.88% | 0.38% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 104.11% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGIQ and WNTR have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGIQ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGIQ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 1.88% for AGIQ.
AGIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AGIQ and 1.01% for WNTR.
Find the right allocation for AGIQ and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer