PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGIQ vs. CRTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGIQ achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 9.32% return.


AGIQ

1D
-0.24%
1M
11.12%
YTD
10.78%
6M
8.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRTC

1D
0.67%
1M
5.40%
YTD
9.32%
6M
9.09%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AGIQ
SoFi Agentic AI ETF
10.78%14.42%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
9.32%5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between AGIQ and CRTC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.88

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AGIQ
CRTC

Technology

56.0%
33.5%

Industrials

14.9%
14.1%

Healthcare

13.4%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.3%

Communication Services

6.0%
16.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

7.1%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

6.0%

Technology

AGIQ
56.0%
CRTC
33.5%

Industrials

AGIQ
14.9%
CRTC
14.1%

Healthcare

AGIQ
13.4%
CRTC
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AGIQ
9.5%
CRTC
6.3%

Communication Services

AGIQ
6.0%
CRTC
16.0%

Basic Materials

AGIQ

-

CRTC
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

AGIQ

-

CRTC
0.0%

Energy

AGIQ

-

CRTC
7.1%

Financial Services

AGIQ

-

CRTC
0.2%

Real Estate

AGIQ

-

CRTC
0.1%

Utilities

AGIQ

-

CRTC
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGIQ vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGIQ

CRTC
CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGIQCRTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.38

+0.23

Drawdowns

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGIQ drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, roughly equal to the maximum CRTC drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGIQ and CRTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGIQCRTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-19.07%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.61%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-2.13%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

Volatility

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGIQCRTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.17%

12.77%

+10.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.17%

15.72%

+7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

15.72%

+7.45%

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGIQ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGIQ vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than CRTC's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AGIQ
SoFi Agentic AI ETF
0.34%0.38%0.00%0.00%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
0.99%1.03%1.13%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGIQ and CRTC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AGIQ.

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.34% for AGIQ.

AGIQ tracks BITA US Agentic AI Select Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AGIQ and 0.35% for CRTC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGIQ and CRTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer