AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AGHG.L (Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - AGHG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.

Performance

AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AGHG.L

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.55%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 3.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MWRD.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)	0.55%	4.58%	2.41%	5.75%	-4.49%
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World	0.00%	0.00%	-1.27%	17.50%	-0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AGHG.L and MWRD.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2022	0.01

AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGHG.L	MWRD.L
Real Estate	18.0%	2.4%
Healthcare	16.6%	12.4%
Financial Services	13.6%	14.7%
Industrials	10.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	10.5%
Utilities	10.4%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	9.4%	6.7%
Communication Services	8.4%	7.5%
Technology	2.0%	24.7%
Basic Materials	-	3.8%
Energy	-	4.4%

Return for Risk

AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGHG.L

AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AGHG.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGHG.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AGHG.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGHG.L	MWRD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.96%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	—	—

AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGHG.L and MWRD.L have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AGHG.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while MWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AGHG.L Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)	2.97%	2.98%	2.78%	2.54%	2.18%
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGHG.L and MWRD.L in my portfolio?

AGHG.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AGHG.L or MWRD.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGHG.L or MWRD.L?

AGHG.L and MWRD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

What is the main difference between AGHG.L and MWRD.L?

AGHG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD.