PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGHG.L is traded in GBp, while 0GGH.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0GGH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGHG.L achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than 0GGH.L's -2.88% return.


AGHG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.42%
6M
0.45%
YTD
0.57%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*

0GGH.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.37%
6M
-2.55%
YTD
-2.88%
1Y
-0.63%
3Y*
1.69%
5Y*
-1.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
0.57%4.32%2.99%5.41%-11.93%-0.37%
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-2.88%7.99%-3.15%2.27%-8.58%-2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AGHG.L and 0GGH.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021

0.49

The correlation between AGHG.L and 0GGH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGHG.L
AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

0GGH.L
0GGH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
0GGH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGHG.L0GGH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.98

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

-0.12

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

-0.30

+3.87

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the 0GGH.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGHG.L and 0GGH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGHG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum 0GGH.L drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGHG.L and 0GGH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGHG.L0GGH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-22.95%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-5.11%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-5.11%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.71%

-22.95%

+7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-16.29%

+14.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.23%

-11.93%

+4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.08%

-1.24%

Volatility

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) is 0.79%, while iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0GGH.L) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that AGHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0GGH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGHG.L0GGH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

1.47%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

3.79%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85%

5.07%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.12%

24.41%

-20.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.11%

21.54%

-17.43%

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGHG.L has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than 0GGH.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGHG.L vs. 0GGH.L - Dividend Comparison

AGHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while 0GGH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
0GGH.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
2.97%2.98%2.77%2.55%2.18%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGHG.L and 0GGH.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 0GGH.L.

AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while 0GGH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for AGHG.L and 0.10% for 0GGH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGHG.L and 0GGH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer