AGGY vs. GDMN
AGGY (WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AGGY is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Yield Enhanced, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. AGGY is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AGGY returned 4.65%/yr vs 60.95%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGGY charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
AGGY vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGY achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.
AGGY
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
GDMN
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 76.93%
- 3Y*
- 60.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGGY vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGY WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 0.40% | 7.38% | 1.82% | 7.29% | -15.26% | -0.14% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -4.13% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGY and GDMN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGGY vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
AGGY
GDMN
AGGY vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGGY | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.98 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | 4.68 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGGY | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
AGGY vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGY drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGY and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGGY | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -52.82% | +31.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -39.03% | +36.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.40% | -39.03% | +33.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -37.06% | +34.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -18.89% | +13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 16.51% | -15.55% |
Volatility
AGGY vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY) is 1.41%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that AGGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGGY | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 17.94% | -16.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 51.79% | -48.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 61.32% | -57.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 47.59% | -41.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.49% | 47.59% | -42.10% |
AGGY vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGY has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGGY vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
AGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than GDMN's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGY WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 4.49% | 4.48% | 4.38% | 3.78% | 2.77% | 2.10% | 2.96% | 3.02% | 3.36% | 2.78% | 3.19% | 1.27% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 2.82% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGGY and GDMN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to AGGY (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGY dropped -20.98% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 4.65% for AGGY. On fees, AGGY is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, AGGY has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGGY is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.
AGGY has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 2.82% for GDMN.
AGGY is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for AGGY and 0.45% for GDMN.
AGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGGY and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer