PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGGY vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGGY vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGY achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than BNDX's 1.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AGGY having a 1.68% annualized return and BNDX not far ahead at 1.69%.


AGGY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.16%
6M
0.91%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.68%

BNDX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.29%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
1.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGY vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGGY
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
1.16%7.38%1.82%7.29%-15.26%-1.72%5.87%11.77%-1.70%5.20%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.50%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AGGY and BNDX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.71

The correlation between AGGY and BNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGGY vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGY
AGGY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGY vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGGYBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

0.86

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

2.38

+2.69

AGGY vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGGY Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGY and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGGY vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGY drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGY and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGYBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-16.23%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-2.93%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.40%

-2.93%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

-15.86%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.98%

-16.23%

-4.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.55%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-3.10%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.06%

-0.07%

Volatility

AGGY vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGGY) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 0.93%. This indicates that AGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGYBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

0.93%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

2.98%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

3.46%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

4.89%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

4.09%

+1.41%

AGGY vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGY has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGGY vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

AGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, which matches BNDX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGGY
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
4.47%4.48%4.38%3.78%2.77%2.10%2.96%3.02%3.36%2.78%3.19%1.27%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.45%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGGY and BNDX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGGY has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to BNDX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGY dropped -20.98% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

On 10-year performance, BNDX leads with 1.69% vs 1.68% for AGGY. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNDX has performed better with a 1.69% return vs 1.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for AGGY.

AGGY has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 4.45% for BNDX.

AGGY is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BNDX is Global Bonds. AGGY tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Yield Enhanced, while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for AGGY and 0.07% for BNDX.

AGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGGY and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer