AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L
AGGU.L (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF) and GAGG.L (Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M) are both Global Bonds funds - AGGU.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index while GAGG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AGGU.L returned 0.58%/yr vs -1.80%/yr for GAGG.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGGU.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for GAGG.L.
Performance
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AGGU.L is traded in USD, while GAGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GAGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGU.L achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than GAGG.L's -0.17% return.
AGGU.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
GAGG.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 2.15%
- 3Y*
- 3.24%
- 5Y*
- -1.80%
- 10Y*
- —
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGU.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.36% | 4.72% | 3.45% | 6.71% | -11.53% | -1.81% | 5.15% | 8.16% | 1.56% | -0.15% |
GAGG.L Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M | -0.17% | 8.00% | -1.48% | 4.50% | -16.02% | -4.78% | 8.87% | 7.27% | -1.36% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGGU.L and GAGG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2017 | 0.48 |
The correlation between AGGU.L and GAGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
AGGU.L
GAGG.L
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) and Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGGU.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.06 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.53 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 1.49 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGGU.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.37 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | -0.25 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.08 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum GAGG.L drawdown of -26.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGU.L and GAGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGGU.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.55% | -26.02% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.24% | -4.06% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.48% | -6.95% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.20% | -24.43% | +9.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -11.60% | +10.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -9.34% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 1.44% | -0.71% |
Volatility
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) is 1.26%, while Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that AGGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGGU.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.87% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 4.46% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08% | 5.85% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 7.23% | -2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 6.86% | -2.43% |
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GAGG.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AGGU.L vs. GAGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGGU.L nor GAGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGGU.L and GAGG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAGG.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAGG.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for AGGU.L.
AGGU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index, while GAGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AGGU.L and 0.03% for GAGG.L.
Find the right allocation for AGGU.L and GAGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer