Correlation
The correlation between AGGU.L and BND is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
AGGU.L vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
AGGU.L and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGGU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both AGGU.L and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGGU.L or BND.
Performance
AGGU.L vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AGGU.L:
1.29
BND:
0.88
AGGU.L:
1.86
BND:
1.24
AGGU.L:
1.24
BND:
1.15
AGGU.L:
0.69
BND:
0.38
AGGU.L:
5.28
BND:
2.07
AGGU.L:
1.01%
BND:
2.13%
AGGU.L:
4.13%
BND:
5.24%
AGGU.L:
-15.55%
BND:
-18.84%
AGGU.L:
-2.00%
BND:
-6.41%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGU.L achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 3.24% return.
AGGU.L
2.33%
1.43%
2.60%
5.34%
3.30%
-0.05%
N/A
BND
3.24%
1.54%
3.48%
4.60%
2.53%
-0.90%
1.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGGU.L vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGGU.L vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AGGU.L
BND
AGGU.L vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AGGU.L vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
AGGU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGU.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.76% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
AGGU.L vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGU.L and BND.
Loading data...
Volatility
AGGU.L vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) is 0.83%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that AGGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...