PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGGG.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGG.L achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 18.82% return.


AGGG.L

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
0.03%
1Y
1.79%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*

XSTC.L

1D
-3.41%
1M
7.31%
YTD
18.82%
6M
18.00%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
33.02%
5Y*
22.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
-0.86%7.96%-1.41%5.38%-15.91%-5.43%9.42%6.84%-1.41%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
18.82%22.94%37.18%56.67%-30.82%32.26%45.87%48.94%-5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AGGG.L and XSTC.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGG.L
AGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGGG.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

2.58

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.34

7.70

-6.36

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGG.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGGG.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

2.22

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.94

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

1.04

-0.99

Drawdowns

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGG.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGG.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-35.20%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.56%

-17.54%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.32%

-27.66%

+20.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

-35.20%

+10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.57%

-6.32%

-5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-7.33%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

5.89%

-4.56%

Volatility

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist (AGGG.L) is 1.84%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that AGGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGG.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

7.90%

-6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

15.57%

-11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.24%

20.40%

-15.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.96%

23.53%

-16.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.42%

23.43%

-17.01%

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGGG.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

AGGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than XSTC.L's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond UCITS Dist
3.17%2.97%2.74%2.01%1.55%1.33%1.46%1.62%0.96%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGGG.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XSTC.L.

AGGG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. AGGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AGGG.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGGG.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer