PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGGA vs. DMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGGA vs. DMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) and DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGA achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than DMX's 1.46% return.


AGGA

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.77%
6M
0.81%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMX

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.46%
6M
2.02%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGA vs. DMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AGGA and DMX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.63

The correlation between AGGA and DMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGGA vs. DMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGA
AGGA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AGGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DMX
DMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGA vs. DMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) and DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGGADMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.62

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

5.06

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

21.23

-7.87

AGGA vs. DMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGGA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the DMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGA and DMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGGADMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.83

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

1.85

+0.32

Drawdowns

AGGA vs. DMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGA drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum DMX drawdown of -2.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGA and DMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGADMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-2.65%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-1.28%

-0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.14%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-0.24%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.31%

+0.05%

Volatility

AGGA vs. DMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) is 0.72%, while DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX) has a volatility of 0.87%. This indicates that AGGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGADMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

0.87%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

1.69%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

2.30%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

3.14%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.20%

3.14%

-0.94%

AGGA vs. DMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DMX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGGA vs. DMX - Dividend Comparison

AGGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than DMX's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AGGA
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF
4.26%2.81%0.00%
DMX
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
5.90%5.96%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGGA and DMX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMX has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to AGGA (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGA dropped -1.47% vs DMX's -2.65%.

On 1-year performance, DMX leads with 6.47% vs 4.85% for AGGA. On fees, DMX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMX has performed better with a 6.47% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AGGA.

DMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 4.26% for AGGA.

They also come from different issuers: Astoria and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AGGA and 0.50% for DMX.

DMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGGA and DMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer