AGES.L vs. IUIT.L
AGES.L (iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGES.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AGES.L returned 4.88%/yr vs 26.05%/yr for IUIT.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGES.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AGES.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGES.L achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return.
AGES.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 26.17%
- 6M
- 24.98%
- 1Y
- 57.16%
- 3Y*
- 32.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.05%
- 10Y*
- 27.67%
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGES.L iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF | 0.19% | 18.29% | 9.75% | 2.81% | -3.90% | 5.94% | 9.34% | 15.79% | -8.27% | 11.22% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 26.17% | 14.17% | 40.92% | 51.48% | -20.73% | 35.36% | 38.94% | 43.23% | 4.43% | 25.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGES.L and IUIT.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AGES.L and IUIT.L has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AGES.L
IUIT.L
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
AGES.L
IUIT.L
-
Financial Services
AGES.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
AGES.L
IUIT.L
-
Real Estate
AGES.L
IUIT.L
-
Basic Materials
AGES.L
IUIT.L
-
Technology
AGES.L
IUIT.L
Communication Services
AGES.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
AGES.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Energy
AGES.L
-
IUIT.L
Industrials
AGES.L
-
IUIT.L
Utilities
AGES.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
AGES.L
IUIT.L
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGES.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.46 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.35 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 8.51 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGES.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.81 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 1.14 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.24 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGES.L drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGES.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGES.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | -28.01% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -16.96% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -28.01% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.15% | -28.01% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -0.78% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -5.29% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 6.70% | -4.71% |
Volatility
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) is 2.73%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that AGES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGES.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 7.14% | -4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 15.20% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.53% | 20.31% | -8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 22.82% | -8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 22.51% | -7.02% |
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGES.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGES.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGES.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGES.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AGES.L.
AGES.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. AGES.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AGES.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for AGES.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer