PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGED.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AGED.L is traded in USD, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGED.L achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 12.50% return.


AGED.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
4.63%
6M
8.81%
YTD
10.97%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*

JPLG.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.42%
6M
9.64%
YTD
12.50%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AGED.L
iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.97%26.75%7.86%9.03%-14.29%4.61%13.29%7.48%
JPLG.L
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
12.50%18.42%10.23%12.69%-10.05%23.54%5.71%6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AGED.L and JPLG.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.76

The correlation between AGED.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGED.L
AGED.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AGED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AGED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGED.LJPLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.30

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

12.39

-1.70

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGED.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGED.L drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, which is greater than JPLG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGED.L and JPLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGED.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.12%

-35.38%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-6.61%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.38%

-12.54%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

-21.57%

-6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

0.00%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-4.43%

-4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.76%

+0.55%

Volatility

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.84%. This indicates that AGED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGED.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

1.84%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

7.09%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

9.11%

+6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

13.15%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

15.73%

+2.01%

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGED.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGED.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AGED.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AGED.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPLG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPLG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AGED.L.

AGED.L tracks Stoxx Global Ageing Population Net USD Index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AGED.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGED.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer