AGED.L vs. CNDX.L
AGED.L (iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CNDX.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGED.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Stoxx Global Ageing Population Net USD Index, while CNDX.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AGED.L returned 6.71%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for CNDX.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGED.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CNDX.L.
Performance
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGED.L achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 15.91% return.
AGED.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
CNDX.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- YTD
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 28.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 20.97%
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGED.L iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.02% | 26.75% | 7.86% | 9.03% | -14.29% | 4.61% | 13.29% | 19.47% | -13.28% | 22.24% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 15.91% | 19.75% | 26.42% | 56.22% | -33.49% | 27.92% | 48.25% | 37.96% | -1.08% | 31.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGED.L and CNDX.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AGED.L and CNDX.L has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank
AGED.L
CNDX.L
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGED.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.57 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 8.61 | +2.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGED.L drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGED.L and CNDX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGED.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.12% | -35.21% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -11.00% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.38% | -22.44% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | -35.21% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -3.87% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -5.12% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 3.29% | -0.98% |
Volatility
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) is 3.77%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that AGED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGED.L | CNDX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 5.89% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 13.78% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 17.32% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 21.15% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 20.13% | -2.39% |
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGED.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGED.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGED.L nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGED.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AGED.L.
AGED.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. AGED.L tracks Stoxx Global Ageing Population Net USD Index, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AGED.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.
Find the right allocation for AGED.L and CNDX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer