AGDAX vs. SCYB
AGDAX (AB High Income Fund) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past year, AGDAX returned 7.67% vs 6.99% for SCYB. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AGDAX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
AGDAX vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGDAX achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 1.55% return.
AGDAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGDAX vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AGDAX AB High Income Fund | 2.07% | 8.06% | 7.36% | 8.51% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGDAX and SCYB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between AGDAX and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGDAX vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
AGDAX
SCYB
AGDAX vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB High Income Fund (AGDAX) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGDAX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.37 | 1.88 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.23 | 2.81 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.37 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.87 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 12.87 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGDAX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 1.88 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.68 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
AGDAX vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGDAX drawdown since its inception was -45.59%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGDAX and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGDAX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.59% | -4.92% | -40.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -2.44% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -0.52% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.54% | +0.02% |
Volatility
AGDAX vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB High Income Fund (AGDAX) is 0.98%, while Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that AGDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGDAX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.07% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 2.93% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 3.76% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 5.13% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.65% | 5.13% | +0.52% |
AGDAX vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGDAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGDAX vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
AGDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than SCYB's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGDAX AB High Income Fund | 6.68% | 6.85% | 5.89% | 6.53% | 6.79% | 4.95% | 5.86% | 6.27% | 7.47% | 5.84% | 6.25% | 7.42% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGDAX and SCYB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCYB has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to AGDAX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGDAX dropped -45.59% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
AGDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGDAX and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer