PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGBP.L achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.


AGBP.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.77%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AGBP.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.42%4.51%3.15%5.67%-12.35%-1.86%4.15%6.29%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%22.49%19.59%-5.61%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AGBP.L and TDGB.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

-0.08

The correlation between AGBP.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGBP.L
AGBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AGBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGBP.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.59

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

6.26

-4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

20.72

-16.92

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGBP.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGBP.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

3.15

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.55

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.98

-0.74

Drawdowns

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGBP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGBP.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGBP.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-29.60%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-4.66%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

-12.41%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.91%

-12.41%

-3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.47%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-3.70%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.41%

-0.59%

Volatility

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) is 1.41%, while VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that AGBP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGBP.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

2.49%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

7.01%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

9.28%

-5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

11.42%

-6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

14.44%

-10.31%

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGBP.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGBP.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

AGBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGBP.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.12%3.00%2.59%1.97%1.56%1.27%1.53%1.65%0.98%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGBP.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGBP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGBP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

AGBP.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. AGBP.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for AGBP.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGBP.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer