PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGBP.L achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than GLAB.L's 0.51% return.


AGBP.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*

GLAB.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AGBP.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.42%4.51%3.15%5.67%-12.35%-1.86%4.15%6.46%1.16%
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
0.51%4.68%3.08%5.73%-12.07%-1.74%4.48%6.42%1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AGBP.L and GLAB.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2018

0.85

The correlation between AGBP.L and GLAB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGBP.L
AGBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AGBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAB.L
GLAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGBP.LGLAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

4.13

-0.33

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGBP.L and GLAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGBP.LGLAB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.05

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.05

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.33

-0.09

Drawdowns

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGBP.L drawdown since its inception was -16.42%, roughly equal to the maximum GLAB.L drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGBP.L and GLAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGBP.LGLAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-15.68%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-2.29%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

-3.51%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.91%

-15.45%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-1.02%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-4.47%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.79%

+0.03%

Volatility

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGBP.LGLAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.45%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

2.49%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

3.08%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

4.53%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

3.94%

+0.19%

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGBP.L and GLAB.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGBP.L vs. GLAB.L - Dividend Comparison

AGBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, which matches GLAB.L's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGBP.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.12%3.00%2.59%1.97%1.56%1.27%1.53%1.65%0.98%
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
3.10%3.06%2.70%1.91%1.48%1.18%1.51%1.70%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGBP.L and GLAB.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGBP.L and GLAB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGBP.L and GLAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer