PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGAC.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AGAC.AS
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-1.21%7.96%1.86%
R1GR.AS
iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF
-9.53%17.57%21.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGAC.AS achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly higher than R1GR.AS's -9.53% return.


AGAC.AS

1D
0.35%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
-1.21%
6M
-0.86%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

R1GR.AS

1D
2.96%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
-9.53%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
19.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGAC.AS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than R1GR.AS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGAC.AS
AGAC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AGAC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

R1GR.AS
R1GR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
R1GR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGAC.AS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGAC.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.92

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.24

6.72

-4.48

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGAC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGAC.AS and R1GR.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGAC.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.99

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between AGAC.AS and R1GR.AS is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AGAC.AS nor R1GR.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGAC.AS drawdown since its inception was -6.87%, smaller than the maximum R1GR.AS drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGAC.AS and R1GR.AS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGAC.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-23.09%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-15.71%

+12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-12.16%

+9.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-3.37%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

4.49%

-3.44%

Volatility

AGAC.AS vs. R1GR.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGAC.AS) is 1.90%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that AGAC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than R1GR.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGAC.ASR1GR.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

5.74%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

11.64%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.10%

19.65%

-14.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

19.03%

-13.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

19.03%

-13.67%