PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGAC.AS) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGAC.AS achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than AGGU.L's -0.24% return.


AGAC.AS

1D
0.73%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGGU.L

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.61%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGAC.AS and AGGU.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGAC.AS
AGAC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGAC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGAC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGU.L
AGGU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AGGU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGAC.AS) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGAC.ASAGGU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.99

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.46

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.92

4.65

-1.73

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGAC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the AGGU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGAC.AS and AGGU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGAC.ASAGGU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.99

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.39

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between AGAC.AS and AGGU.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AGAC.AS nor AGGU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGAC.AS drawdown since its inception was -6.87%, smaller than the maximum AGGU.L drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGAC.AS and AGGU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGAC.ASAGGU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-15.55%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-2.25%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-1.61%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-3.95%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.71%

+0.33%

Volatility

AGAC.AS vs. AGGU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGAC.AS) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) at 1.37%. This indicates that AGAC.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGAC.ASAGGU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.37%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

2.04%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

3.40%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

4.73%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

4.44%

+0.94%