PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AG vs. IAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AG vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AG achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than IAG's -7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, AG has underperformed IAG with an annualized return of 1.10%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


AG

1D
-1.22%
1M
0.18%
6M
-10.26%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
83.24%
3Y*
43.23%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
1.10%

IAG

1D
-0.97%
1M
-5.08%
6M
-10.98%
YTD
-7.10%
1Y
117.30%
3Y*
78.58%
5Y*
39.12%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AG vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
1.86%204.32%-10.47%-25.99%-24.73%-17.24%9.62%108.15%-12.61%-11.66%
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
-7.10%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%-14.71%-1.61%1.36%-36.88%51.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AG and IAG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010

0.73

The correlation between AG and IAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AG:

$8.37B

IAG:

$8.85B

EPS

AG:

$0.59

IAG:

$1.73

PE Ratio

AG:

28.53

IAG:

8.87

PEG Ratio

AG:

0.51

IAG:

0.05

PS Ratio

AG:

5.62

IAG:

2.62

PB Ratio

AG:

2.93

IAG:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

AG:

$1.49B

IAG:

$3.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AG:

$646.49M

IAG:

$1.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

AG:

$824.25M

IAG:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AG vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AG
AG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AG vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGIAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.06

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

6.68

-2.65

AG vs. IAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AG Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AG and IAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AG vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AG drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, smaller than the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AG and IAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGIAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-95.55%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.88%

-39.60%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.88%

-39.60%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.28%

-73.69%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.82%

-86.46%

+5.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.00%

-37.65%

-9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.12%

-56.11%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.08%

18.10%

+5.98%

Volatility

AG vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a higher volatility of 20.45% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) at 18.59%. This indicates that AG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGIAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.45%

18.59%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.24%

50.34%

+7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.69%

62.39%

+12.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.08%

60.72%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.02%

58.63%

+3.39%

Dividends

AG vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.21%0.12%0.33%0.34%0.31%0.14%
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AG vs. IAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Majestic Silver Corp. and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
470.07M
1.03B
(AG) Total Revenue
(IAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AG vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between First Majestic Silver Corp. and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
55.3%
55.4%
Portfolio components
AG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 259.78M and revenue of 470.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

AG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 232.71M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

AG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 126.32M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AG and IAG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AG has higher volatility (20.45%) compared to IAG (18.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AG dropped -90.20% vs IAG's -95.55%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AG and IAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer