PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AG vs. AEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AG vs. AEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AG is traded in USD, while AEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AG achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than AEP.L's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, AG has underperformed AEP.L with an annualized return of 3.02%, while AEP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.


AG

1D
-3.67%
1M
-24.27%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
7.53%
1Y
98.98%
3Y*
42.72%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
3.02%

AEP.L

1D
1.91%
1M
-24.33%
YTD
10.98%
6M
15.48%
1Y
95.38%
3Y*
30.92%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
13.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AG vs. AEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
-0.60%204.32%-10.47%-25.99%-24.73%-17.24%9.62%108.15%-12.61%-11.66%
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
10.98%140.93%-2.29%-8.24%-0.30%22.51%4.76%5.61%-30.04%25.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AG and AEP.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010

0.11

The correlation between AG and AEP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (10 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AG:

$8.30B

AEP.L:

£594.92M

EPS

AG:

$0.60

AEP.L:

£4.05

PE Ratio

AG:

27.74

AEP.L:

3.78

PEG Ratio

AG:

0.49

AEP.L:

0.37

PS Ratio

AG:

5.47

AEP.L:

0.72

PB Ratio

AG:

2.86

AEP.L:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

AG:

$1.49B

AEP.L:

£838.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AG:

$646.49M

AEP.L:

£214.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

AG:

$824.25M

AEP.L:

£230.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AG vs. AEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AG
AG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AEP.L
AEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AG vs. AEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGAEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.74

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

14.17

-9.22

AG vs. AEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the AEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AG and AEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGAEP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.09

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.60

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.39

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.15

-0.12

Drawdowns

AG vs. AEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AG drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than AEP.L's maximum drawdown of -77.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AG and AEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGAEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-77.26%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.28%

-34.60%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.28%

-34.60%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.74%

-35.42%

-41.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.82%

-64.61%

-16.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.28%

-33.35%

-14.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.19%

-33.79%

-25.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.05%

6.71%

+13.34%

Volatility

AG vs. AEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) is 24.69%, while Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a volatility of 30.82%. This indicates that AG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGAEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.69%

30.82%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.00%

38.16%

+19.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.13%

45.56%

+27.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.67%

34.43%

+27.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.96%

35.66%

+26.30%

Dividends

AG vs. AEP.L - Dividend Comparison

AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than AEP.L's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEP.L
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc
4.28%4.80%1.81%4.78%0.51%0.10%0.07%0.41%0.52%0.39%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.21%0.12%0.33%0.34%0.31%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AG vs. AEP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Majestic Silver Corp. and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
470.07M
235.87M
(AG) Total Revenue
(AEP.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AG values in USD, AEP.L values in GBp

AG vs. AEP.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between First Majestic Silver Corp. and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
55.3%
26.8%
Portfolio components
AG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 259.78M and revenue of 470.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

AEP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a gross profit of 63.11M and revenue of 235.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.

AG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 232.71M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.

AEP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported an operating income of 53.57M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.

AG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 126.32M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.

AEP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a net income of 42.42M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AG and AEP.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AG and AEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer