PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFVLX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Finance Select Fund (AFVLX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AFVLX having a 12.38% return and BUFBX slightly lower at 12.28%.


AFVLX

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.50%
6M
9.06%
YTD
12.38%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*

BUFBX

1D
1.02%
1M
0.39%
6M
10.49%
YTD
12.28%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFVLX
Applied Finance Select Fund
12.38%13.12%7.06%19.43%-10.88%27.73%15.33%12.42%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
12.28%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AFVLX and BUFBX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between AFVLX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFVLX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFVLX
AFVLX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AFVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
AFVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Select Fund (AFVLX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFVLXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.66

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

11.49

-2.77

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFVLX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFVLX drawdown since its inception was -36.29%, smaller than the maximum BUFBX drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFVLX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFVLXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.29%

-39.78%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-4.45%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-12.85%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.12%

-14.67%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.70%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-4.71%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

1.42%

+0.81%

Volatility

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Finance Select Fund (AFVLX) is 3.47%, while Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that AFVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFVLXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

4.00%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

7.40%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

9.56%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

13.44%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

15.59%

+4.57%

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFVLX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFVLX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

AFVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than BUFBX's 8.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFVLX
Applied Finance Select Fund
3.33%3.74%3.80%1.18%1.02%2.11%1.09%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.11%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFVLX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFBX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to AFVLX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFVLX dropped -36.29% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFVLX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer