PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. 0388.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AFTY vs. 0388.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AFTY vs. 0388.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%20.48%-12.80%-22.47%-7.37%33.77%44.23%-24.26%45.15%
0388.HK
Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd
-3.82%41.86%14.42%-18.39%-24.35%8.65%72.48%15.25%-3.09%32.93%
Different Trading Currencies

AFTY is traded in USD, while 0388.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0388.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

0388.HK

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-3.82%
6M
-11.30%
1Y
14.15%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTY vs. 0388.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTY

0388.HK
0388.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
0388.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0388.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
0388.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
0388.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
0388.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. 0388.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFTY vs. 0388.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFTY0388.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and 0388.HK is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AFTY vs. 0388.HK - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 0388.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
0388.HK
Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd
3.13%2.67%2.81%3.06%2.26%2.01%1.58%2.68%2.86%1.91%2.77%2.63%

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. 0388.HK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTY0388.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.12%

Volatility

AFTY vs. 0388.HK - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AFTY0388.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.47%