PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTFX vs. BLPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America Class F-1 (AFTFX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (BLPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFTFX achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than BLPFX's 6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, AFTFX has underperformed BLPFX with an annualized return of 1.85%, while BLPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.83% annualized return.


AFTFX

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.35%
6M
0.25%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
3.39%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
1.85%
ALL TIME*
3.50%

BLPFX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.19%
6M
3.43%
YTD
6.65%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
13.09%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
8.83%
ALL TIME*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFTFX
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America Class F-1
0.49%3.77%2.22%6.41%-9.23%1.96%4.64%7.09%0.66%5.43%
BLPFX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
6.65%16.99%11.25%13.80%-13.59%13.75%13.17%19.49%-4.63%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AFTFX and BLPFX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.04

Over the past year, AFTFX and BLPFX have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTFX vs. BLPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTFX
AFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BLPFX
BLPFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BLPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America Class F-1 (AFTFX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (BLPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFTFXBLPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.27

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.85

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

7.95

-0.66

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the BLPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFTFX and BLPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFTFX drawdown since its inception was -13.99%, smaller than the maximum BLPFX drawdown of -23.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFTFX and BLPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTFXBLPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.99%

-23.21%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-7.08%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.07%

-10.36%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.99%

-20.72%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.99%

-23.21%

+9.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-1.36%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-2.90%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.65%

-0.85%

Volatility

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America Class F-1 (AFTFX) is 0.94%, while American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (BLPFX) has a volatility of 1.95%. This indicates that AFTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFTFXBLPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

1.95%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

7.27%

-5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

9.01%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

10.47%

-6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.78%

10.81%

-7.03%

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BLPFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFTFX vs. BLPFX - Dividend Comparison

AFTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than BLPFX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTFX
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America Class F-1
2.98%2.92%2.84%2.62%2.25%2.39%2.34%2.52%2.75%2.93%3.02%3.10%
BLPFX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.76%6.05%3.55%2.24%5.95%4.92%2.52%3.79%4.64%3.44%3.61%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFTFX and BLPFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLPFX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to AFTFX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFTFX dropped -13.99% vs BLPFX's -23.21%.

AFTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFTFX and BLPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer