AFSM vs. NOIEX
AFSM (First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF) and NOIEX (Northern Income Equity Fund) are both funds - AFSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while NOIEX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Northern Funds. Over the past 5 years, AFSM returned 9.11%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for NOIEX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFSM charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NOIEX.
Performance
AFSM vs. NOIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFSM achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly higher than NOIEX's 10.55% return.
AFSM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
NOIEX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
AFSM vs. NOIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 20.52% | 9.99% | 10.55% | 22.23% | -17.50% | 26.03% | 8.44% | 2.39% |
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund | 10.55% | 18.81% | 24.28% | 19.56% | -13.34% | 27.96% | 11.03% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFSM and NOIEX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between AFSM and NOIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFSM vs. NOIEX — Risk / Return Rank
AFSM
NOIEX
AFSM vs. NOIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFSM | NOIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 3.33 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | 14.64 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFSM vs. NOIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, roughly equal to the maximum NOIEX drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and NOIEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFSM | NOIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | -45.66% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -8.39% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.07% | -18.06% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -21.89% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.99% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -4.98% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.89% | +1.01% |
Volatility
AFSM vs. NOIEX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) at 4.28%. This indicates that AFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFSM | NOIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 4.28% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 9.48% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.37% | 12.25% | +6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 16.42% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 18.00% | +7.37% |
AFSM vs. NOIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than NOIEX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFSM vs. NOIEX - Dividend Comparison
AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than NOIEX's 7.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 0.45% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.92% | 1.28% | 0.35% | 0.53% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund | 7.30% | 7.92% | 6.11% | 7.03% | 5.44% | 14.26% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 15.73% | 7.56% | 3.02% | 5.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFSM and NOIEX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFSM has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to NOIEX (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFSM dropped -43.54% vs NOIEX's -45.66%.
NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFSM and NOIEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer