AFSM vs. DWAT
AFSM (First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. AFSM charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
AFSM vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFSM
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFSM vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 8.38% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
AFSM vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFSM
DWAT
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
AFSM
DWAT
Healthcare
AFSM
DWAT
Industrials
AFSM
DWAT
Financial Services
AFSM
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
AFSM
DWAT
Energy
AFSM
DWAT
Basic Materials
AFSM
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
AFSM
DWAT
Real Estate
AFSM
DWAT
Communication Services
AFSM
DWAT
Utilities
AFSM
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFSM vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
AFSM
DWAT
AFSM vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFSM | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFSM | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AFSM vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFSM | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.54% | 0.00% | -43.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | 0.00% | -9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility
AFSM vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFSM | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 0.00% | +17.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 0.00% | +20.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 0.00% | +25.40% |
AFSM vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFSM vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFSM First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.92% | 1.28% | 0.35% | 0.53% | 0.32% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AFSM is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFSM is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
AFSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
AFSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for AFSM and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for AFSM and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer