PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFSM vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFSM vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFSM

1D
-0.99%
1M
3.29%
YTD
15.65%
6M
15.19%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFSM vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


AFSM vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFSM
DWAT

Technology

20.3%
10.2%

Healthcare

17.8%
5.3%

Industrials

16.9%
25.1%

Financial Services

14.9%
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
5.2%

Energy

5.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.9%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
6.5%

Real Estate

3.8%
5.1%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.4%

Utilities

0.3%
5.3%

Technology

AFSM
20.3%
DWAT
10.2%

Healthcare

AFSM
17.8%
DWAT
5.3%

Industrials

AFSM
16.9%
DWAT
25.1%

Financial Services

AFSM
14.9%
DWAT
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AFSM
8.6%
DWAT
5.2%

Energy

AFSM
5.3%
DWAT
4.2%

Basic Materials

AFSM
4.9%
DWAT
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

AFSM
4.7%
DWAT
6.5%

Real Estate

AFSM
3.8%
DWAT
5.1%

Communication Services

AFSM
2.3%
DWAT
3.4%

Utilities

AFSM
0.3%
DWAT
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFSM vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSM
AFSM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSM vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFSMDWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.41

AFSM vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFSMDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

Drawdowns

AFSM vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSM drawdown since its inception was -43.54%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSM and DWAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFSMDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.54%

0.00%

-43.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

0.00%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

0.00%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

Volatility

AFSM vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFSMDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

0.00%

+17.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

0.00%

+20.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.40%

0.00%

+25.40%

AFSM vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSM has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFSM vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

AFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
0.47%0.58%0.58%0.92%1.28%0.35%0.53%0.32%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, AFSM is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFSM is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

AFSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

AFSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for AFSM and 1.83% for DWAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFSM and DWAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer