PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFSC vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AFSC vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AFSC vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFSC achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 3.60% return.


AFSC

1D
3.06%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
0.79%
6M
2.45%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IJR

1D
2.85%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
3.60%
6M
5.26%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFSC vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFSC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AFSC vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFSC
AFSC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFSC vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFSCIJRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

0.91

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

1.41

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.61

5.77

-0.17

AFSC vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFSC and IJR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFSCIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.91

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.42

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between AFSC and IJR is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AFSC vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

AFSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than IJR's 1.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFSC
abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF
0.08%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.29%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%

Drawdowns

AFSC vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFSC drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFSC and IJR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AFSCIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-58.15%

+36.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-14.85%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.54%

-5.73%

-1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-9.34%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.66%

-0.34%

Volatility

AFSC vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 6.27%. This indicates that AFSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AFSCIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

6.27%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

12.98%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.82%

22.66%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

21.52%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.98%

22.91%

+0.07%