AFQSX vs. RQEIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AFQSX (Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund) and RQEIX (RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, AFQSX returned 2.52%/yr vs 4.59%/yr for RQEIX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFQSX charges 1.70%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for RQEIX.

Performance

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFQSX achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly higher than RQEIX's 8.58% return.

AFQSX

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 13.11%
• 1Y: 22.99%
• 3Y*: 6.25%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: —

RQEIX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 6.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AFQSX Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund	11.34%	3.78%	5.83%	2.10%	-22.23%	44.62%	-23.80%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	8.58%	14.97%	15.35%	20.27%	-17.06%	-8.45%	14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AFQSX and RQEIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.38

The correlation between AFQSX and RQEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AFQSX vs. RQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFQSX

AFQSX Risk / Return Rank: 74
AFQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AFQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AFQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AFQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AFQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RQEIX

RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFQSX	RQEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	3.25	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	4.81	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.64	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	7.75	-3.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.91	19.53	-5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFQSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the RQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFQSX and RQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFQSX	RQEIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	3.25	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	0.28	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.23	-0.23

Drawdowns

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFQSX drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than RQEIX's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFQSX and RQEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFQSX	RQEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.01%	-33.25%	-59.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.01%	-3.36%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.01%	-17.96%	-75.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.01%	-32.96%	-60.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.53%	-0.56%	-89.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-11.27%	-23.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	1.33%	+0.33%

Volatility

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) is 3.14%, while RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that AFQSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFQSX	RQEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	3.50%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.46%	5.36%	+3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.05%	8.04%	+2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	637.17%	16.73%	+620.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	562.70%	16.03%	+546.67%

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFQSX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RQEIX's 1.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFQSX vs. RQEIX - Dividend Comparison

AFQSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RQEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AFQSX Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	13.64%	14.53%	0.38%	0.00%	0.38%	0.00%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFQSX and RQEIX in my portfolio?

AFQSX and RQEIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFQSX or RQEIX?

RQEIX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to AFQSX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFQSX dropped -93.01% vs RQEIX's -33.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RQEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.