PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. SIXA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 30.98% return, which is significantly higher than SIXA's 13.49% return.


AFOS

1D
1.51%
1M
1.47%
6M
22.53%
YTD
30.98%
1Y
71.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIXA

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.26%
6M
11.49%
YTD
13.49%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and SIXA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOS
AFOS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AFOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFOS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AFOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOS vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFOSSIXADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.35

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.24

3.20

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.13

12.13

+15.00

AFOS vs. SIXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFOS Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the SIXA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFOS and SIXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum SIXA drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and SIXA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSSIXADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-18.38%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-5.59%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-0.73%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-2.95%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.47%

+1.18%

Volatility

AFOS vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison

ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.35%. This indicates that AFOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSSIXADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

2.35%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

6.94%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.12%

8.89%

+13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.75%

12.78%

+8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

13.28%

+8.47%

AFOS vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOS vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than SIXA's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.23%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
2.02%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFOS and SIXA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFOS has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to SIXA (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFOS dropped -11.52% vs SIXA's -18.38%.

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 71.54% vs 17.81% for SIXA. On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 71.54% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.86% for SIXA.

AFOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and SIXA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer