PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. RSSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFOS having a 32.04% return and RSSY slightly higher at 32.45%.


AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSSY

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.78%
YTD
32.45%
6M
27.13%
1Y
47.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and RSSY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOS

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOS vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFOSRSSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.35

0.75

+3.60

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and RSSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSRSSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-29.57%

+18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.16%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-7.37%

+6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

AFOS vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSRSSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.19%

13.28%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

18.35%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

18.35%

+1.84%

AFOS vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOS vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than RSSY's 1.54% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFOS and RSSY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 1.04% for RSSY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and RSSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer