AFOS vs. BLCR
AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFOS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.
Performance
AFOS vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 32.04% return, which is significantly higher than BLCR's 19.56% return.
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCR
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 21.53%
- 1Y
- 47.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 19.56% | 17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFOS and BLCR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFOS vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
AFOS
BLCR
AFOS vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFOS | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.35 | 1.90 | +2.45 |
Drawdowns
AFOS vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and BLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFOS | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -21.29% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.37% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.19% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
AFOS vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFOS | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 15.54% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 17.47% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 17.47% | +2.72% |
AFOS vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFOS vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than BLCR's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFOS and BLCR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
AFOS and BLCR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.22%.
They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.36% for BLCR.
Find the right allocation for AFOS and BLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer