AFOCX vs. FGRTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFOCX (Archer Focus Fund) and FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AFOCX returned 9.57%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for FGRTX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFOCX charges 3.29%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FGRTX.

Performance

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AFOCX having a 10.52% return and FGRTX slightly lower at 10.50%.

AFOCX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 10.52%
• 6M: 10.26%
• 1Y: 15.74%
• 3Y*: 16.42%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —

FGRTX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 6M: 12.42%
• 1Y: 31.38%
• 3Y*: 25.59%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: 16.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AFOCX Archer Focus Fund	10.52%	0.73%	29.35%	14.14%	-9.32%	19.98%	10.13%
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	10.50%	26.92%	25.98%	26.51%	-8.98%	26.29%	12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AFOCX and FGRTX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.86

The correlation between AFOCX and FGRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AFOCX vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOCX

AFOCX Risk / Return Rank: 24
AFOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
AFOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
AFOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
AFOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
AFOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FGRTX

FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFOCX	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.70	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.70	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.49	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	3.59	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	16.31	-9.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFOCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFOCX and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFOCX	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.70	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.98	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.48	-0.44

Drawdowns

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOCX drawdown since its inception was -91.26%, which is greater than FGRTX's maximum drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOCX and FGRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFOCX	FGRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.26%	-56.17%	-35.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.49%	-8.99%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-91.26%	-18.51%	-72.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.26%	-23.35%	-67.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.67%	-0.32%	-88.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.68%	-8.72%	-13.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	1.98%	+0.47%

Volatility

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) is 2.48%, while Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that AFOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFOCX	FGRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.48%	2.71%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.20%	9.06%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.16%	11.98%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	385.54%	16.70%	+368.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	340.66%	18.12%	+322.54%

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOCX has a 3.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFOCX vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

AFOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FGRTX's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFOCX Archer Focus Fund	2.48%	2.63%	22.61%	1.65%	6.64%	9.74%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	3.52%	3.89%	2.68%	2.06%	4.38%	4.79%	7.96%	12.98%	21.72%	15.57%	1.97%	4.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFOCX and FGRTX in my portfolio?

AFOCX and FGRTX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFOCX or FGRTX?

FGRTX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to AFOCX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFOCX dropped -91.26% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.