AFNIX vs. RCKSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFNIX (AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I) and RCKSX (Rock Oak Core Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFNIX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RCKSX.

Performance

AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AFNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCKSX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 14.42%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 7.42%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	1.74%	11.36%	16.23%	6.59%	-8.77%	25.23%	6.60%	25.71%	-1.98%	19.51%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	14.10%	12.99%	15.12%	15.57%	-18.09%	9.96%	13.75%	19.05%	-2.14%	22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AFNIX and RCKSX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.81

The correlation between AFNIX and RCKSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AFNIX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCKSX

RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 56
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFNIX	RCKSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.38	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFNIX	RCKSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-57.88%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.14%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.60%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.51%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFNIX	RCKSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.56%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.66%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.55%	—

AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.18%, more than RCKSX's 5.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	31.18%	14.13%	6.88%	3.43%	4.61%	1.78%	1.75%	2.13%	2.04%	1.72%	1.79%	2.66%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	5.48%	6.26%	0.47%	0.71%	1.00%	4.31%	16.56%	3.18%	0.59%	5.91%	0.70%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFNIX and RCKSX in my portfolio?

AFNIX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.