AFNIX vs. RCKSX
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX).
AFNIX is managed by AAM. It was launched on Jul 5, 2012. RCKSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Dec 31, 2004.
Performance
AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 1.74% | 11.36% | 16.23% | 6.59% | -8.77% | 25.23% | 6.60% | 25.71% | -1.98% | 19.51% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 6.05% | 12.99% | 15.12% | 15.57% | -18.09% | 9.96% | 13.75% | 19.05% | -2.14% | 22.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFNIX achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 6.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AFNIX having a 10.47% annualized return and RCKSX not far behind at 10.21%.
AFNIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
RCKSX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFNIX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank
AFNIX
RCKSX
AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFNIX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.96 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.76 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 9.21 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFNIX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.38 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.36 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFNIX and RCKSX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison
AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.45%, more than RCKSX's 5.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 31.45% | 14.13% | 6.88% | 3.43% | 4.61% | 1.78% | 1.75% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 1.72% | 1.79% | 2.66% |
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund | 5.90% | 6.26% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.00% | 4.31% | 16.56% | 3.18% | 0.59% | 5.91% | 0.70% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFNIX drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFNIX and RCKSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFNIX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.60% | -57.88% | +22.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.43% | -11.29% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.57% | -23.50% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.60% | -33.10% | -2.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -3.25% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -9.58% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.15% | -0.03% |
Volatility
AFNIX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) is 3.07%, while Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that AFNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFNIX | RCKSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.42% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.63% | 8.76% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.64% | 16.37% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 15.77% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.58% | -1.33% |