AFNIX vs. QUERX
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX).
AFNIX is managed by AAM. It was launched on Jul 5, 2012. QUERX is an actively managed fund by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 9, 2012.
Performance
AFNIX vs. QUERX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFNIX vs. QUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 1.74% | 11.36% | 16.23% | 6.59% | -8.77% | 25.23% | 6.60% | 25.71% | -1.98% | 19.51% |
QUERX AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 | 1.76% | 6.98% | 13.98% | 9.55% | -13.73% | 23.56% | 13.20% | 28.82% | -0.21% | 22.22% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AFNIX having a 1.74% return and QUERX slightly higher at 1.76%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AFNIX having a 10.47% annualized return and QUERX not far ahead at 10.65%.
AFNIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
QUERX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFNIX vs. QUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than QUERX's 0.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFNIX vs. QUERX — Risk / Return Rank
AFNIX
QUERX
AFNIX vs. QUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFNIX | QUERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.34 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.56 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.08 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.45 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.34 | 2.06 | +4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFNIX | QUERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.34 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.70 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.70 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFNIX and QUERX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AFNIX vs. QUERX - Dividend Comparison
AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.45%, more than QUERX's 22.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 31.45% | 14.13% | 6.88% | 3.43% | 4.61% | 1.78% | 1.75% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 1.72% | 1.79% | 2.66% |
QUERX AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 | 22.46% | 22.86% | 24.47% | 24.43% | 10.37% | 2.62% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 2.06% | 6.28% |
Drawdowns
AFNIX vs. QUERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFNIX drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, which is greater than QUERX's maximum drawdown of -30.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFNIX and QUERX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFNIX | QUERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.60% | -30.81% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.43% | -8.92% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.57% | -22.04% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.60% | -30.81% | -4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -4.33% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.95% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.95% | +0.20% |
Volatility
AFNIX vs. QUERX - Volatility Comparison
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund Class R6 (QUERX) at 2.81%. This indicates that AFNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFNIX | QUERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.81% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.63% | 5.75% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 12.05% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 13.08% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 15.23% | +1.02% |