AFNIX vs. FLCPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AFNIX (AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFNIX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.

Performance

AFNIX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AFNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCPX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: 14.11%
• 10Y*: 15.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFNIX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	1.74%	11.36%	16.23%	6.59%	-8.77%	25.23%	6.60%	25.71%	-1.98%	19.51%
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	10.21%	17.84%	25.08%	26.25%	-18.06%	28.61%	18.24%	31.59%	-4.38%	21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AFNIX and FLCPX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2016	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between AFNIX and FLCPX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AFNIX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFNIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLCPX

FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFNIX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFNIX	FLCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.18	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.05	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.79	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFNIX	FLCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.87%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.35%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.18%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFNIX	FLCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.48%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.16%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.20%	—

AFNIX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFNIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFNIX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

AFNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.18%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	31.18%	14.13%	6.88%	3.43%	4.61%	1.78%	1.75%	2.13%	2.04%	1.72%	1.79%	2.66%
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	0.51%	0.56%	6.11%	7.05%	11.23%	10.38%	3.93%	1.74%	2.18%	1.57%	0.76%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFNIX and FLCPX in my portfolio?

AFNIX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.