AFMFX vs. FNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX).
AFMFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Feb 21, 1950. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Performance
AFMFX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFMFX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMFX American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 | -3.07% | 16.43% | 15.30% | 9.77% | -4.19% | 23.64% | 5.04% | 21.90% | -1.98% | 11.75% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 2.76% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 12.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFMFX achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 2.76% return.
AFMFX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -7.90%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFMFX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFMFX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
AFMFX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
AFMFX
FNDX
AFMFX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFMFX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.24 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.80 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.73 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 8.31 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFMFX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.24 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.74 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFMFX and FNDX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AFMFX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
AFMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than FNDX's 1.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMFX American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 | 8.15% | 7.86% | 6.60% | 4.06% | 5.20% | 3.58% | 2.22% | 4.89% | 6.75% | 6.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.62% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
AFMFX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFMFX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMFX and FNDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFMFX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.79% | -37.72% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -12.25% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.16% | -19.06% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -4.21% | -3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -3.59% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.55% | -0.21% |
Volatility
AFMFX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class F-3 (AFMFX) is 3.36%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that AFMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFMFX | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 3.93% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 8.05% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 16.21% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 15.26% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 17.51% | -2.95% |