PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AFMD vs. AALB.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

AFMD vs. AALB.AS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFMD (Affimed N.V.) and AALB.AS (Aalberts Industries NV) are both stocks. AFMD operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AALB.AS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials).

Performance

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affimed N.V. (AFMD) and Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AFMD is traded in USD, while AALB.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AALB.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

AFMD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

AALB.AS

1D
-1.48%
1M
9.47%
YTD
40.94%
6M
45.69%
1Y
31.63%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
-1.17%
10Y*
5.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
AFMD
Affimed N.V.		0.00%
AALB.AS
Aalberts Industries NV		14.01%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Affimed N.V.

Aalberts Industries NV

Often compared with AFMD:
AFMD vs. AJAX.ASAFMD vs. APM.DEAFMD vs. ACOMO.ASAFMD vs. AERAFMD vs. AGN.ASAFMD vs. AIR.PAAFMD vs. ABN.AS
Often compared with AALB.AS:
AALB.AS vs. SPM.MIAALB.AS vs. ALREW.PAAALB.AS vs. NEX.PAAALB.AS vs. ARCAYAALB.AS vs. APAM.ASAALB.AS vs. IBE.MCAALB.AS vs. IWDA.AS

Return for Risk

AFMD vs. AALB.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AFMD
AALB.AS
AALB.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AALB.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affimed N.V. (AFMD) and Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AFMDAALB.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.91

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

-0.03

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.16

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

—

0.14

—

Drawdowns

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMD drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum AALB.AS drawdown of -85.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMD and AALB.AS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AFMDAALB.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-85.49%

+85.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-22.98%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-44.42%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-52.75%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-63.34%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-19.49%

+19.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-25.86%

+25.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

12.57%

—

Volatility

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AFMDAALB.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

9.79%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

24.45%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

34.16%

-34.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

35.08%

-35.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

32.74%

-32.74%

Dividends

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Dividend Comparison

AFMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AALB.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AALB.AS
Aalberts Industries NV		2.98%4.03%3.29%2.83%6.32%1.03%2.19%1.87%2.24%1.37%1.69%1.45%
AFMD
Affimed N.V.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AFMD vs. AALB.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Affimed N.V. and Aalberts Industries NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. AFMD values in USD, AALB.AS values in EUR
Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFMD and AALB.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer